Shuffle master is a little known equity, as evidenced by the fact that it is 95% owned by institutional investors such as pension funds and mutual funds. It is what would be considered a small cap stock, with a capitalization of a mere 500 million dollars. The company is unique in that it maintains almost no debt and maintains no long-term debt. With a beta of.659, Shuffle Master has less than half the undifferentiable risk that its market peers do, but more than the industry average of.54. Shuffle Master's P/E is higher than average at slightly more than 32. The industry average is between 25 and 26. According to the most recent income statement, 12-month trailing revenue growth totals 17%. This is exceeded by earnings growth, which at 20.9% reflects both decreasing expenses and the non-existence of interest expenses.
Shuffle Master's profit margin, at 25.82%, is quite high, as is its operating margin of 38.64%. The company derives its profits from the sale and lease of gambling equipment. One of the reasons that Shuffle Master is unable to borrow is that many banks are unwilling to lend to the gambling industry. However, Shuffle Master is largely self-financed; it does not pay any dividends. With a market capitalization of 11.22 billion, International Game Technology is Shuffle Master's largest competitor.
Shuffle Master, Inc. develops, manufactures and markets automatic card shufflers that are used with card-based table games. As of the publication of the last 10-K SEC form at the end of last year, approximately 9,475 of its shufflers were installed in casinos and other gaming establishments, of which 3,237 units were leased and 6,238 units were sold. Shuffle Master also sells table games and licenses these products to casinos. Such games include the Let It Ride basic game, the Let It Ride Bonus game and the Three Card Poker game. As of October 31, 2002, 1,517 of Shuffle Master's table games were installed. Shuffle Master also develops and markets slot machines and slot game operating systems. The company licenses and sells slot machine games and sells them to casinos, of which 765 units were on lease and 147 were sold.
For the first three fiscal quarters...
Pay Equity As American business enters the 21st century the issue of unequal pay for equal work continues. The course of attaining the objectives of just wages for all workers by eradicating the wage disparities between men and women workers is known as pay equity. It necessitates that the unequal jobs of comparatively same value to the employer is to be given the equal wages. Pay equity is considered to be a
Pay Equity 1001 EHR Tutorial Exercise Week No & Date: Corrections/refinement during tutorial discussion - feedback (Done in class) What explanations are given by this alliance to account for the gender-wage gap? What evidence is used to support this? Is it convincing? Why or why not? You might also like to look at the submissions made to Fair Work as part of the equal remuneration case. Submissions were also made by employers and employer associations
Zippittelli v. J.C. Penney Company Case Study Case Summary The case of Zippittelli v. J.C. Penney Company stems from a hiring dispute between the plaintiff, Joanne Zippittelli, and her employer, J.C. Penney Company. In the summer of 2004 the plaintiff worked for the defendant as a general lead clerk in the Call Service Center, and after being informed by her boss that the position of shift operations manager had become available, the
The other reason for higher salary is based on the performance of the employees. If the employee generates more revenue, they may be given higher compensation as a reward which will also act as an incentive for future improved performance. This is usually the case for sales department whereby the pay can be based on commission. Basing on the red-circling, higher compensation can be given to the employee i.e.
From the standpoint of the labor market, the lack of equity in the public system would continue to exist until the market force becomes united and demands a better protection of its rights. For now however, when the people fear the loss of their jobs and when the market place is saturated, the public employers are not pressured to implement equity. At the level of personal evaluation and job contributions,
AMSC had announced a letter of intent for secured debt financing in July of 2003 (AMSC 2003 Annual Report) when the stock was trading in the range of $8 per share. The blackout gave the firm's stock considerable momentum, and it finished the month of August up over 50% at $12.19 per share (MSN Moneycentral, 2010). Equity issues normally result in dilution of the stock price, since the issue
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now